每日一问答

[涅薇儿·德拉诺尔]

作为自诩律师的人来说FAQ是非常重要的东西，但F姐姐似乎忙着干别的去了，所以我就擅自接手一点儿FAQ的翻译好了

声明：该翻译基于机翻+LZ仅仅点了一点跨职的语法知识，如果有错请指出。
一楼做目录
爪抓和爪击：如果我获得了爪抓天武，我可以让爪抓天武长在脚上吗？
紧勒：当一个生物用紧勒怪物特性来擒抱敌人时，是何时造成紧勒伤害的？
DR会对由魔法导致的钝击，穿刺，挥砍伤害造成怎样的影响呢？
负能量亲和：这个能力（怪物图鉴2，299页）究竟是怎么判定的？

[涅薇儿·德拉诺尔]

爪抓和爪击：如果我获得了爪抓天武，我可以让爪抓天武长在脚上吗？
答：
如果你是个两足生物（有大致的类人外形，双臂和双腿），你的爪子必须在手上而不能脚上。
如果你是个四足生物（或四条以上的腿），你可以让爪子长在脚上。如果你所有的脚都有爪子，除非你有猛扑（狮冲）或耙抓能力不然你就不能把全部的爪抓用于这轮的攻击。
爪击非常像爪抓，但通常会长在两足生物的脚上（特别是飞行的双足生物例如一只巨鹰或鹰身女妖）
会让你获得爪抓天武的能力通常不能用在有爪击天武的部位上（换句话说，你不能“画皮”关于游戏规则的数据，所以你可以把它用在其他的肢体上）

劇透 -   :

Claws and Talons: If I gain claw attacks, can I put those claw attacks on my feet?
If you are a bipedal creature (roughly humanoid-shaped, with two arms and two legs), your claws must go on your hands; you can not assign them to any other limb or body part.

If you are a quadruped (or have more than four legs), you can have claws on your feet. If you have claws on all of your feet, normally you can't use all of those claw attacks on your turn unless you have a special ability such as pounce or rake.

Talons are much like claws, but go on a creature's feet, usually a bipedal creature (especially a flying bipedal creature such as a giant eagle or harpy). An ability that grants you claw attacks cannot be used as if they were talon attacks (in other words, you can't "re-skin" the ability's game mechanics so you can use it on a different limb).

[涅薇儿·德拉诺尔]

紧勒：当一个生物用紧勒怪物特性来擒抱敌人时，是何时造成紧勒伤害的？
答：
一个有紧勒的生物会在每一次对敌人做出成功的擒抱检定时造成紧勒伤害。这包括进入擒抱状态的第一次检定（例如使用攫抓怪物特性的时候）

劇透 -   :

Constrict: When a creature with the constrict universal monster rule (Bestiary, page 298) grapples a foe, when does it deal constrict damage?
A creature with constrict deals this additional damage every time it makes a successful grapple check against a foe. This includes the first check to establish the grapple (such as when using the grab universal monster rule).

[涅薇儿·德拉诺尔]

DR会对由魔法导致的钝击，穿刺，挥砍伤害造成怎样的影响呢？
答：虽然DR的定义（在299页）里说的是：“该生物在被能量攻击 (包括非魔法的)、法术、类法术能力、以及超自然能力攻击时仍受到正常伤害。”但实际上它只是在说明伤害类型并没有在上述能力中有特定的类型，例如火焰伤害或者穿刺伤害。换句话说，DR不会防止受到“魔法攻击的无类型伤害”。
然而，如果一个魔法攻击明确的提到了它给予钝击，穿刺，挥砍伤害，那DR就会正常的生效如同伤害来源于一把物理武器。（另外魔法攻击通常都不会有伤害类型，少量有钝/刺/砍伤害的法术都会特别说明，例如用来确定是否会导致一个软泥怪分裂）（这句太长所以看不太懂，只能脑补）
例如，冰风暴法术造成3d6点钝击伤害和2D6的寒冷伤害。如果你对一群僵尸施放冰风暴，僵尸的5 /挥砍DR会降低他们受到的5点法术攻击伤害。他们的DR对他们抵抗魔法部分的伤害没有用，因为DR它不适用于能量攻击。

劇透 -   :

How does DR interact with magical effects that deal bludgeoning, piercing, or slashing damage?
Although the Bestiary definition of Damage Reduction (page 299) says "The creature takes normal damage from energy attacks (even nonmagical ones), spells, spell-like abilities, and supernatural abilities," that's actually just referring to damage that isn't specifically called out as being of a particular type, such as fire damage or piercing damage. In other words, DR doesn't protect against "typeless damage" from magical attacks.
However, if a magical attack specifically mentions that it deals bludgeoning, piercing, or slashing damage, DR affects that damage normally, as if it were from a physical weapon. (Otherwise the magical attack might as well not have a damage type, as it would only interface with B/P/S damage in a very few corner cases, such as whether or not an ooze splits from that attack.)
For example, the ice storm spell deals 3d6 points of bludgeoning damage and 2d6 points of cold damage. If you cast ice storm at a group of zombies, the zombie's DR 5/slashing protects them against 5 points of the spell's bludgeoning damage. Their DR doesn't help them against the spell's cold damage because DR doesn't apply to energy attacks.

[涅薇儿·德拉诺尔]

负能量亲和：这个能力（怪物图鉴2，299页）究竟是怎么判定的？
答：
这个能力的效果是让目标被负能量治疗(如同一个亡灵)和被正能量伤害(如同一个亡灵);这是自动生效且目标或能量使用者无法改变的。不过,这能力的描述是有点让人摸不着头脑,因为“reacts to”,没有一个明确的定义。 这个能力将在以后版本的怪物图鉴2做出修订。

更新:299页 ——负能量亲和的能力描述,用以下说明替换过去的条目:

负能量亲和(特异) 虽然这个生物是活的,但在任何对亡灵有不同效果的判定上视作亡灵,例如治疗法术和引导能量。 格式 :负能量亲和; 位置 :防御能力。

劇透 -   :

Negative Energy Affinity: How is this ability (Bestiary 2, page 299) supposed to work?
The intent of this ability is that the creature is healed by negative energy (like an undead) and harmed by positive energy (like an undead); this is automatic and has nothing to do with the intent of the target or the energy-wielder. However, as written, the ability is a bit confusing because of the phrase “reacts to,” which doesn’t have a clear definition. This ability will be changed in the next printing of Bestiary 2.

Update: Page 299—In the description of the Negative Energy Affinity ability, replace the current entry with the following:

Negative Energy Affinity (Ex) The creature is alive, but is treated as undead for all effects that affect undead differently than living creatures, such as cure spells and channeled energy. Format: negative energy affinity; Location: Defensive Abilities.

[/quote]